Whereas many companies proceed to view nature solely by way of the lens of regulation, Volvo Automotive Firm has superior extra — recognizing the price of nature, decreasing its impacts on biodiversity and investing in conservation and restoration. These ambitions are summarized prepared assertion launched Sept 9.
There’s no single path for establishing firm nature ambitions, so companies must mates to seek out out best practices. And it’s worth noting that Volvo has pulled once more on its EV product sales targets, pleasurable its dedication to produce solely completely electrical vehicles by 2030. Its nature approach, though, presents lessons for various automakers and totally different types of producers.
Proper right here’s a summary of Volvo’s technique.
Shifting forward with the right information on the market
One in all many main challenges companies face when evaluating their impacts on nature is the dearth of high-quality information and of certainty about which devices to utilize. The stakes are significantly extreme when assessing baseline impacts, which is able to most likely be used as a level of reference correctly into the long run.
Volvo used manufacturing and product sales information from 2021 for chosen automotive fashions representing its complete fleet. That’s imperfect, as a single yr of data doesn’t seize variation over time, however it absolutely provides a model for shifting forward with present belongings fairly than delaying movement.
Related webcast
Connecting Native climate and Nature To Advance Firm Sustainability Strategies
Be part of to take heed to from consultants on the price and challenges with advancing nature strategies and the need to affix native climate and nature to advance firm sustainability movement and progress.
October 15, 2024
Using the baseline dataset, the Volvo workers carried out a lifecycle have an effect on analysis following the ReCiPe model. This model estimates biodiversity impacts from cradle to grave, from helpful useful resource extraction in Volvo’s upstream value chain to impacts from water and gasoline utilized by vehicles on the road by way of their end of life.
The output is a single metric — species/yr — that represents the potential number of species to fade in a given area over one yr. As with all fashions for measuring biodiversity impacts, there are tradeoffs to the ReCiPe technique.
The ReCiPe Model for Measuring Biodiversity Impacts
Prioritizing movement based on the perfect have an effect on
Unsurprisingly, 64 % of Volvo’s biodiversity impacts are produced by vehicles on the road, largely from the manufacturing and use of fuels.
The company is already working to reduce these impacts by way of its native climate ambitions (although, as talked about above, it has simply currently scaled once more these ambitions). Nonetheless, the looming question for the auto commerce is whether or not or not elevated mining for battery manufacturing for electrical vehicles will counteract (or outweigh) the potential biodiversity optimistic elements from decreasing greenhouse gasoline emissions.
Acknowledging this dilemma, Volvo was one in all many first companies to call for a moratorium on deep-sea mining. It has not equipped a solution, though, in its place stating it ought to “proceed to judge and develop actions to stay away from and reduce the biodiversity impacts of batteries, whereas on the same time sustaining the native climate have an effect on abatement benefits.”
An additional 34 % of the company’s biodiversity impacts occur throughout the upstream value chain. That’s moreover the place water utilization has one of the best have an effect on on biodiversity. The place assertion doesn’t provide loads component about actions it ought to take to reduce upstream impacts; Volvo’s beforehand acknowledged positions on sustainable provides and water administration embody:
- Tracing raw provides of concern to their origin and performing basic and enhanced due diligence for accountable sourcing.
- Phasing out utilizing hazardous substances in automotive manufacturing.
- Reducing per-car water withdrawal in all operations by 50 % between 2018 and 2030.
- Setting worldwide air air pollution limits for basin-level nutrient plenty and performing remediation the place wished.
The remaining 2 % of impacts occur in Volvo’s operations, and the company is making an attempt into the state of nature spherical its companies, beginning with its headquarters in Sweden.
Sadly, Volvo has not publicly launched the entire, detailed outcomes of its biodiversity analysis, so we are going to solely analyze knowledge reported as an alternative statements.
Following the mitigation hierarchy
Volvo plainly states the fact of our current monetary system that is not usually spoken aloud by companies: “Will most likely be inconceivable to stay away from and reduce all detrimental impacts on nature and biodiversity. As such, an funding in restoration and conservation will most likely be required to counterbalance our residual detrimental impacts.”
The company states its intentions to scrupulously select restoration and conservation actions in landscapes immediately affected by its enterprise actions and simply currently employed anyone to information this effort. This differs from totally different companies that put cash into initiatives faraway from their very personal operations and supply chains as a philanthropic endeavor fairly than an actual mitigation effort.
On the draw again, it’s not clear from this place assertion how a whole lot of the company’s impacts will most likely be prevented and lowered sooner than they flip to mitigation.
In the long run, Volvo’s new assertion models the stage for movement. The next steps — abating native climate change with out extra harming biodiversity, attaining traceability, bettering circularity and investing in ecosystem resilience — will show how far it is eager to go.